Google falters in search 'success rate' study

Google logoThere's no denying Google is the leader in online search, but a new study says only two out of three Google searches lead users to what they're looking for.

Online research and analytics firm Experian Hitwise released a report last week on what it defined as successful search results. That is, it looked at how many searches from Google, compared to other options like Bing and Yahoo, actually resulted in users clicking on a link from the results page.

Surprisingly, only 67.6% of searches performed through Google were successful, according to the Experian metric.

Meanwhile, Bing had a success rate of 80.0% and Yahoo was at the top of the charts with 81.4%.

"The share of unsuccessful searches highlights the opportunity for both the search engines and marketers to evaluate the search engine result pages to ensure that searchers are finding relevant information," said Experian Hitwise in a statement.

Of course, the grain of salt to be taken with these results is that some Google searches do not require users to click a link to find the information they want. For example, if users are curious to find out the conversion of 12 feet into meters, they can just type in "12 feet to meters" or some variation thereof, and the conversion rate will be presented at the top of the results page.

The same thing applies for currency conversions, simple mathematical equations, the current time, and many other common searches that seek to find a specific answer rather than a full website.

However, both Bing and Yahoo offer the same in-results information, so in the end that factor could just be a wash, unless Google users are more likely to take advantage of the feature.

Nevertheless, there is certainly something to be said about the large disparity between the success rates, but it's unlikely anything will change soon. After all, Google still powers 66.1% of all online searches. The next closest competitor, Yahoo, only grabs 14.5% of the market.

Source: TG Daily

Tags: Google, Google+

Add comment

Your name:
Sign in with:
Your comment:

Enter code:

E-mail (not required)
E-mail will not be disclosed to the third party

Last news

Galaxy Note10 really is built around a 6.7-inch display
You may still be able to download your content
Facebook, Messenger and Instagram are all going away
Minimize apps to a floating, always-on-top bubble
Japan Display has been providing LCDs for the iPhone XR, the only LCD model in Apple’s 2018 line-up
The 2001 operating system has reached its lowest share level
The entire TSMC 5nm design infrastructure is available now from TSMC
The smartphone uses a Snapdragon 660 processor running Android 9 Pie
The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) Review
The evolution of the successful smartphone, now with a waterproof body and USB Type-C
February 7, 2017 / 2
Samsung Galaxy TabPro S - a tablet with the Windows-keyboard
The first Windows-tablet with the 12-inch display Super AMOLED
June 7, 2016 /
Keyboards for iOS
Ten iOS keyboards review
July 18, 2015 /
Samsung E1200 Mobile Phone Review
A cheap phone with a good screen
March 8, 2015 / 4
Creative Sound Blaster Z sound card review
Good sound for those who are not satisfied with the onboard solution
September 25, 2014 / 2
Samsung Galaxy Gear: Smartwatch at High Price
The first smartwatch from Samsung - almost a smartphone with a small body
December 19, 2013 /

News Archive



Do you use microSD card with your phone?
or leave your own version in comments (15)