Samsung Spectacles: Google Glass competitor spotted in design patent

Samsung logoThe Wall Street Journal has spotted a Samsung design patent for wearable computer glasses. Patents are usually as ugly as possible, but keep in mind that this is a design patent. Unlike a regular patent, the final product should look pretty close to the patent (for comparison, here's a design patent for an iPad).

Samsung is going a completely different route than Google. Instead of a self-contained Android wearable that wirelessly tethers to a phone for mobile data and phone calls, the Samsung goggles are literally tethered—with a micro-USB connection. The Samsung Spectacles (that's what they're calling these, right?) physically plug into a smartphone, which sounds like it could fix a big problem with Google Glass. As a self-contained unit, Google Glass has to fill every available space with battery.

Samsung Spectacles: Google Glass competitor spotted in design patent

Theoretically, Samsung's glasses could draw power from the smartphone's battery, which could make the device less bulky than Glass and give it a longer battery life. An SoC would not even be necessary in the device when you have a cable; the glasses could just be a display device for the smartphone. Physically tethering the device opens up a whole world of possibilities, with the only downside being that you now have to do something with the cable. Given that most of the world has found a way to deal with wired headphones, this doesn't seem like a major hurdle.

Samsung Spectacles

You won't need headphones, because Samsung has opted to integrate earbuds into the frame of the glasses. This picks up a huge feature that Google Glass left on the table: music. The patent says that the device will allow users to "take phone calls and listen to music during workouts," and it categorizes the product as "sports glasses," meaning that Samsung doesn't expect these to be worn all day.

Comparing these to the Galaxy Gear, it seems that Samsung still has many of the same challenges to overcome. How much will consumers be willing to pay for a pair of sports glasses? What will device compatibility be like, especially if the glasses require sending things like power, music, and phone information over micro-USB? Not every phone will necessarily be equipped to do that.

Hopefully Samsung will figure it out and won't repeat the mistakes of the Gear. It's very hard to get people to switch devices just to use a wearable computer.

Source: Ars Technica

Tags: Google Glass, Samsung

Comments
Add comment

Your name:
Sign in with:
or
Your comment:


Enter code:

E-mail (not required)
E-mail will not be disclosed to the third party


Last news

 
Galaxy Note10 really is built around a 6.7-inch display
 
You may still be able to download your content
 
Facebook, Messenger and Instagram are all going away
 
Minimize apps to a floating, always-on-top bubble
 
Japan Display has been providing LCDs for the iPhone XR, the only LCD model in Apple’s 2018 line-up
 
The 2001 operating system has reached its lowest share level
 
The entire TSMC 5nm design infrastructure is available now from TSMC
 
The smartphone uses a Snapdragon 660 processor running Android 9 Pie
The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) Review
The evolution of the successful smartphone, now with a waterproof body and USB Type-C
February 7, 2017 / 2
Samsung Galaxy TabPro S - a tablet with the Windows-keyboard
The first Windows-tablet with the 12-inch display Super AMOLED
June 7, 2016 /
Keyboards for iOS
Ten iOS keyboards review
July 18, 2015 /
Samsung E1200 Mobile Phone Review
A cheap phone with a good screen
March 8, 2015 / 4
Creative Sound Blaster Z sound card review
Good sound for those who are not satisfied with the onboard solution
September 25, 2014 / 2
Samsung Galaxy Gear: Smartwatch at High Price
The first smartwatch from Samsung - almost a smartphone with a small body
December 19, 2013 /
 
 

News Archive

 
 
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   




Poll

Do you use microSD card with your phone?
or leave your own version in comments (16)