New Bluetooth 4.2 spec brings IPv6, better privacy, and increased speed

Bluetooth logoAlmost exactly a year ago, the Bluetooth Special Interest Group (SIG) announced Bluetooth 4.1, an update that improved speed for bulk data transfers, reduced the likelihood of LTE interference, and made it easier for various "smart" devices to talk directly to one another without using a hub like a phone or computer as an intermediary. The final update to the spec laid the groundwork for the introduction of IPv6 to the Bluetooth specification—the newly announced Bluetooth 4.2 completes that work, and devices that support it will be able to access the Internet directly over IPv6 and 6LoWPAN.

Other improvements to the specification concern themselves with privacy and speed. With Bluetooth 4.2, Bluetooth beacons attempting to connect to and track your device can't do so unless you've given them permission. Transfer speeds between two Bluetooth devices have also improved by "up to 2.5 times" thanks to increased capacity for Bluetooth Smart data packets, which can now contain about ten times as much data as before.

It was possible for existing Bluetooth 4.0 adapters to support Bluetooth 4.1 with a software update, and we've contacted the Bluetooth SIG to confirm that this is also the case for Bluetooth 4.2. Version 4.0 is still by far the most common version of the spec in shipping consumer devices, though mobile platforms like Android Lollipop have begun to add native support for version 4.1.

If you're interested in learning more, the Bluetooth SIG has published extensive technical information on Bluetooth 4.2 and earlier versions of the spec on this page.

New Bluetooth 4.2 spec brings IPv6,

Update: Apparently some but not all Bluetooth 4.2 features will be available as an update for older Bluetooth adapters. "Privacy features may be available via firmware update, but it does ultimately depend on the manufacturer implementation," a representative for the Bluetooth SIG told Ars. "The increased speed and packet size features will require a hardware update." The representative is also checking to see whether the FCC will need to recertify older Bluetooth 4.x adapters before they can support Bluetooth 4.2 features. In any case, it doesn't appear as though older hardware will be able to take full advantage of the newer spec.

Update 2: The Bluetooth SIG says there is "definitely no need for FCC recertification" if an OEM chooses to update an existing adapter to support Bluetooth 4.2 features.

Source: Ars Technica

Tags: Bluetooth, IPv6

Comments
Add comment

Your name:
Sign in with:
or
Your comment:


Enter code:

E-mail (not required)
E-mail will not be disclosed to the third party


Last news

 
Galaxy Note10 really is built around a 6.7-inch display
 
You may still be able to download your content
 
Facebook, Messenger and Instagram are all going away
 
Minimize apps to a floating, always-on-top bubble
 
Japan Display has been providing LCDs for the iPhone XR, the only LCD model in Apple’s 2018 line-up
 
The 2001 operating system has reached its lowest share level
 
The entire TSMC 5nm design infrastructure is available now from TSMC
 
The smartphone uses a Snapdragon 660 processor running Android 9 Pie
The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) Review
The evolution of the successful smartphone, now with a waterproof body and USB Type-C
February 7, 2017 / 2
Samsung Galaxy TabPro S - a tablet with the Windows-keyboard
The first Windows-tablet with the 12-inch display Super AMOLED
June 7, 2016 /
Keyboards for iOS
Ten iOS keyboards review
July 18, 2015 /
Samsung E1200 Mobile Phone Review
A cheap phone with a good screen
March 8, 2015 / 4
Creative Sound Blaster Z sound card review
Good sound for those who are not satisfied with the onboard solution
September 25, 2014 / 2
Samsung Galaxy Gear: Smartwatch at High Price
The first smartwatch from Samsung - almost a smartphone with a small body
December 19, 2013 /
 
 

News Archive

 
 
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     




Poll

Do you use microSD card with your phone?
or leave your own version in comments (16)