Apple cant end lawsuit over breaking FaceTime on iPhone 4, judge rules

Apple logoBack in February 2017, two Californians sued Apple in a proposed class-action lawsuit over the fact that the company disabled an older version of iOS. Disabling the outdated iOS had the effect of making FaceTime stop working on the customers' iPhone 4 devices.

According to a ruling issued last Friday by a federal judge in San Jose, California, Apple cannot get the case dismissed. US District Court Judge Lucy Koh brushed aside Apple's response to the case, including dismissing an argument that the case could not proceed on the grounds that the plaintiffs were not injured because FaceTime is a free app that comes with iPhones.

"Plaintiffs paid for their iPhones, and FaceTime is a 'feature' of the iPhone and thus a component of the iPhones cost," Judge Koh wrote.

In 2012, Apple lost a lawsuit brought by VirnetX, a patent assertion entity sometimes pejoratively called a "patent troll." As a result, Apple changed the way that FaceTime works, initially relying much more on Akamai so that it would no longer have to pay fees to VirnetX. Eventually, though, by 2014, Apple released iOS 7, which disabled FaceTime on older models. That meant that iPhone 4 and 4S owners either had to live with the change, upgrade to iOS 7 (which ran slower on the older hardware), or buy newer iPhones. (New versions of VirnetXs patent case continued on into 2016.)

"Apple broke FaceTime in order to gain a financial advantage and reduce relay fees," Judge Koh also wrote. "Further, although Apple knew that it had intentionally disabled FaceTime, Apple told consumers that FaceTime had stopped working because of a 'bug resulting from a device certificate that expired.' Apple did not tell users that Apple had intentionally caused the digital certificate to expire prematurely."

Another hearing is scheduled for August 23, 2017, with a preliminary trial date set for January 28, 2019.

Apple did not immediately respond to Ars' request for comment.

Source: Ars Technica

Tags: Apple, legal action

Add comment

Your name:
Sign in with:
Your comment:

Enter code:

E-mail (not required)
E-mail will not be disclosed to the third party

Last news

Galaxy Note10 really is built around a 6.7-inch display
You may still be able to download your content
Facebook, Messenger and Instagram are all going away
Minimize apps to a floating, always-on-top bubble
Japan Display has been providing LCDs for the iPhone XR, the only LCD model in Apples 2018 line-up
The 2001 operating system has reached its lowest share level
The entire TSMC 5nm design infrastructure is available now from TSMC
The smartphone uses a Snapdragon 660 processor running Android 9 Pie
The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) Review
The evolution of the successful smartphone, now with a waterproof body and USB Type-C
February 7, 2017 / 2
Samsung Galaxy TabPro S - a tablet with the Windows-keyboard
The first Windows-tablet with the 12-inch display Super AMOLED
June 7, 2016 /
Keyboards for iOS
Ten iOS keyboards review
July 18, 2015 /
Samsung E1200 Mobile Phone Review
A cheap phone with a good screen
March 8, 2015 / 4
Creative Sound Blaster Z sound card review
Good sound for those who are not satisfied with the onboard solution
September 25, 2014 / 2
Samsung Galaxy Gear: Smartwatch at High Price
The first smartwatch from Samsung - almost a smartphone with a small body
December 19, 2013 /

News Archive



Do you use microSD card with your phone?
or leave your own version in comments (15)