HP Slate 7 is a 7-inch Android 4 Tablet PC with good sound


For the present time HP Slate 7 is available in four variants 2800, 2801, 4600 and 4601. However, it is the support page that describes the variants of the device not the Slate 7 specifications site. It is not surprising that we didnt manage to find any noticeable difference between the above mentioned variants. The PDF-manual below, which available for download, as well as Slate 7 the firmware, the links to it are placed under the Specifications Table, do not give any information either.

HP Slate 7 and Google Nexus 7 specs

A glance is enough to understand that dealing with the HP Slate 7 one should not expect to get a business class device. It is not only the mobile communication module, that the device lacks, that shortage at least could be forgiven, the tablet PC has no GPS (one of course may try to accept it), and, what is after all strange, no FM-receiver. It is evident that without GPS and mobile communication module the device is going to be used instead of an electronic book, for example, on the road. Assuming that, it is logically to expect that the device should be equipped with a radio receiver. The unpleasant impression is completed by the 2nd version Bluetooth, not the 3rd or 4th one. The only merit here is that Wi-Fi supports 802.11n speed standard.

HP Slate 7 SoC specs

It is quite demonstrative as well that HP didnt get enough courage to give the tablet PC processor brand name. All the available information about it is the core architecture (Cortex-A9), the number of cores (two) and the frequency (1.6 GHz). There is a great possibility that some little-known processor brand was used, otherwise what is the point of hiding its name? All in all the device performance should be enough for Android, thanks to 1 GB RAM as well, but the tablet PC is really not the sharpest tool in the shed.

On the other hand, the processor has Mali-400 MP video core, the same as a 2012 winner Samsung Galaxy S III. Having that in mind, one should expect good games performance. May be the device is no great shakes, yet promises quite stable operation.

HP Slate 7 RAM

The internal storage capacity is not big. The device has a microSD slot and supports the card with the memory up to 32 GB memory, which is definitely a merit. HP highlights that Slate 7, moreover, has good sound characteristics claiming that the tablet PC is equipped with the special beats audio sound chip. We are going to tell more about that while describing the software.

HP Slate 7 battery capacity is 13.4 Wh, which is less than that of the ASUS Nexus 7, of the year 2012, and the latter has the quad-core, not the dual-core, processor. It is interesting to see the autonomous operation tests. HP promises that Slate 7 will be able to operate in the video playback mode for 5 hours, which is not bad at all.

Generally, one may say that the HP Slate 7 characteristics are far from those of the lower business class devices. To become a business class it should have GPS, 3G, the manufacturer could at least has offered the device variants equipped with these modules. One may sooner attribute the device to an advanced electronic book, the device for internet roaming and an interesting solution for games. On the whole, it is sooner a consumer device.


HP Slate 7 offers quite modest characteristics, close to the chinese devices within the price range of $150-200 or such prominent brands as the Kindle Fire and Nexus 7 (of the year 2012). Yet HP claims to offer a device of high quality, close to a business-class one. Thats why we decided to compare it to the previous year release tablet PC, Fujitsu STYLISTIC M532. This is the youngest model in the range of expensive models, a budget business class, so to say. What is the difference between the device of 2013, claiming to be in the same range, and the previous seasons average quality device? By the way the Fujitsu Tablet PC has the same platform as the ASUS Nexus 7 of 2012.

When first comparing HP Slate 7 to the Fujitsu STYLISTIC M532 it seems that the Slate is going to lose in each and every test. Lets have a look at the test results.

HP Slate 7 AnTutu test results

The results of the very first test become a surprise. Generally, it is HP Slate 7 which becomes a winner according to the results of AnTuTu System Review. The HP device showed worse results during memory, processor and drive tests, yet its two- and three dimensional graphics was faster.

HP Slate 7 Quadrant test results

Testing with Quadrant makes the Fujitsu the winner; on the other hand the gap between the results is not big. That is quite more than acceptable for such an inexpensive device like Slate 7!

HP Slate 7 RD 3D test results

HP Slate 7 Nenamark2 test results

The graphics deserves special attention. Synthetic benchmarks result gives the draw during the RD3D testing the Fujitsu shows better results, while during the Nenamark 2 it is the HP device.

HP Slate 7 electopia test results

Electopia is not a synthetic, but a real game benchmark. The Fujitsu result during that test is only 4 FPS. We dont know what kind of processor is used in the HP Slate 7, but its graphics core appears to be really powerful.

HP Slate 7 Linpack test results

HP Slate 7 SunSpider test results

After the rest of the tests the Fujitsu device becomes the winner. All in all, the quad-core NVIDIA Tegra 3 reveals itself when it comes to the tasks demanding high computing power of the central processing unit.

HP Slate 7 power test results

Contents Next
View all
Page 1. Design
Page 2. Controls and Connectors, Packaging
Page 3. Display, Camera
Page 4. Specifications, Performance
Page 5. Software, Conclusion, Price
Add comment

Your name:
Sign in with:
Your comment:

Enter code:

E-mail (not required)
E-mail will not be disclosed to the third party

Guest#16 11
It's much easier to unestdrand when you put it that way!
Guest#27 9
This is really innerestitg, You're a very skilled blogger. I've joined your rss feed and look forward to seeking more of your great post. Also, I have shared your web site in my social networks!
Guest#35 8
I used Drumagog some before Trigger was aabliavle, and I can tell you that Trigger is far superior (this was Drumagog 4, maybe 5 is better). The problem with 4, which may be better now, was that it wasn't phase accurate, which is pretty crucial. This was particularly a problem with kick drums because any out of phase samples would cancel out tons of low end. The only way to really use it was to print the audio and manually go through EVERY hit to make sure the phase was tight. As you can probably imagine, this was a nightmare, especially if there was a lot of intricate kick work, or God forbid, long passages of double kick. In my experience, Trigger is tight and phase accurate, so it can save literally hours of work.
Guest#411 13
Pas vrai!! J ai fait defection avec d autres officiers de notre propre chef! C est notre dignite qui nous y a pousse. On a rien touche de l Etranger! Il faut se reilrelev!
Galaxy Note10 really is built around a 6.7-inch display
Facebook, Messenger and Instagram are all going away
Japan Display has been providing LCDs for the iPhone XR, the only LCD model in Apples 2018 line-up
The entire TSMC 5nm design infrastructure is available now from TSMC
You may still be able to download your content
Minimize apps to a floating, always-on-top bubble
The 2001 operating system has reached its lowest share level
The smartphone uses a Snapdragon 660 processor running Android 9 Pie


Do you use microSD card with your phone?
or leave your own version in comments (16)